[TMG] Somsak just gave a wonderful talk while samuk just gave bad LIAR

[supat at supat.eu.org]

Yesterday, I invite my friend to gave his experiance to my PhD class.
His name is Somsak. Ofcuse differ from my Another friend name Somsak that 
I invite him several week ago to gave lecture on DBMS and slackware
(he is the first person in TH who wrote text book on slackware)

This morning, another Somsak that I did not know before who is 1/5 of PTM 
leaders just gave a wonderful talk. I used to know only Maha Jumlong and 
Pae Lim but now , based on Somsak wonderful talk, I do certify that he is 
a very good person that full of moral and all of his words are the truth. 
While NBT the bad TV also gave samuk LIAR words at the same time.

I am sure 99% of bad people beleive bad liar from SAMUK because they are 
muk ngai' and phai' tum' and beleive in beleivable words but a LIAR from 
samuk bad mouth.

I can analyse and proof that all words from samuk is a lie.

PTM will win simply by putting my analysis to NBT at same time samuk put 
his lie. THe problem is I have no chance to do so :(

zxc555

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, supat at supat.eu.org wrote:

>
> ¤ÅÔ»¹ÕéÂÒǶ֧ 4 ¹Ò·Õ¤ÃÖ觷¹Ë¹èͤÃѺ 
> ÍÂèÒ§äáç´Õ¡è͹˹éÒ¹ÕéÁÕ¢èÒǵÓÃǨ»ÅÍÁµÑÇà¢éÒä»ã¹¡ÅØèÁ¾Ñ¹¸ÁԵà 
> ¤ÅÔ»¹ÕéÍÒ¨ªèǵÓÃǨ㹡ÒÃᶵèÍä»ÇèҾѹ¸ÁÔµÃÊÃéҧʶҹ¡Òóì
>
> ËÃ×Íàµ×͹ãËé¾Ñ¹¸ÁÔµÃÃÐÇѧÊÒµÓÃǨÀÒÂ㹾ǡµÑÇàͧ
>
> ÍÂèÒ§äáç´Õ¼ÁÁÕÍÕ¡¤ÅÔ»¤ÃѺ  ¤ÅÔ»¹Õé¨Ò¡¾Ñ¹¸ÁÔµÃàͧ 
> Êѧࡵ»éÍÁÂÒÁ·Ò§¢ÇÒÁ×͹ФÃѺ
>
>
> Whatever the bomb come from what location, it is not proof that who did it.
>
> To proof who did it is easy.
>
> Persons who did it is bad.
> Samuk was proven to be bad.
> PTM was proven to be good.
>
> conclusion:
> Samuk's gang did it.
>
> Q.E.D.
>
> very easy indeed.
>
> (y2kman, who got 60 in geometry in all years in school)
>
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, supat at supat.eu.org wrote:
>
>> 
>> I insist to what I said is correct:
>> 
>> "ÈÖŸÃÃÁ  is solution"
>> 
>> Why?
>> 
>> Because
>> 
>> 1. most TH laws were written from bad persons that lack off true knowledge 
>> and seriously lack off moral.
>> 
>> 2. laws can be changed easily and it was changed every day. so, to hold on 
>> it is hold on nothing while moral never change.
>> 
>> 3. problems happen because bad persons that wrote the laws stupitly forced 
>> good persons to obey bad laws that take advantage on them.
>> 
>> 4. judge is simply make decission under the bad laws. so, it was impossible 
>> to good persons to accept it. even judge is unbias but because the laws are 
>> bad. so good persons will not allow moral to be under the laws.
>> 
>> 5. no arguement to disproof that what i said is wrong.
>> all good persons in the world accept that moral is above every thing 
>> including laws must be under the moral.
>> 
>> please let me know if you may have arguments.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> zxc555
>> 
>> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, supat at supat.eu.org wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> I will go to bed now after watching all tv for long time.
>>> 
>>> My conclusion is NBT deserve to be burnt based on its badly distorted 
>>> unbiased news. Ofcause, bad monk that said there that LAW are above moral 
>>> should be burnt too !!!
>>> 
>>> zxc555
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, supat at supat.eu.org wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The song was said:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> à¾Å§à¾×èÍà¸Í·ÕèÃÑ¡
>>>> ¤ÓÃéͧ - ÍÔÊÃÒ ºÃè§ÊÇÑÊ´Ôì/·Ó¹Í§ - Á¹ÑÊ »ÔµÔÊÒ¹µì
>>>> 
>>>> <>ÁèÒ¹»ÃÐà¾³Õ ·Õè¡Ñé¹¢ÇÒ¡¢ÇÒ§
>>>> ÂѧÁÕ˹·Ò§ à»Ô´·Ò§ãËéÊѡ˹
>>>> ·Ó¹ºËÑÇ㨠ÂÒ¡äÃé¡çäÁè·Ò¹·¹
>>>> ¶éÒàÃÒÊͧ¤¹ ¨ÐÁÕà˵ؼŠ¡çªÁªÔ´ä´é
>>>> 
>>>> ËèÒ§ä¡Åà¾Õ§ä˹ ¡çäÁèÍÒ¨¾é¹
>>>> Á×ÍàÃÒÊͧ¤¹ àÍ×éÍÁ¤ÇéÒÁÒÍÔ§áͺäÇé
>>>> áµèàÃÒÊͧ¤¹ ÊØ´¤Ô´àÅ×Í¡·ÓµÒÁã¨
>>>> ¾º¡Ñ¹ÊÒÂä» ¨Ö§µéͧËéÒÁ㨠·Ñé§æ ÊØ´ÃÑ¡
>>>> 
>>>> ÈÕŸÃÃÁ à˹×ÍÊÔè§Í×è¹ã´
>>>> áÂ觢ͧÃÑ¡ã¤Ã ºÒ»ã¨¹Ñ¡
>>>> ÂÍÁªéÓÍØÃÒ ãªè©Ñ¹¨ÐÊÔé¹ÃÑ¡
>>>> ©Ñ¹ÂÍÁÍ¡ËÑ¡ à¾×èÍà¸Í·ÕèÃÑ¡ ª×è¹ã¨
>>>> 
>>>> ÊÙé·¹´Ñºä¿ÊÇÒ· ´Ç§¹Ñé¹
>>>> ¡çÂѧàËÅ×ͤÇѹ ¤Ô´¶Ö§ ¤Ô´¶Ö§äÁèÇÒÂ
>>>> ¤Ô´¶Ö§àËÅ×Íà¡Ô¹ »èÒ¹¹Õéà¸Í¤§ÃéͧäËé
>>>> àÊÕ´Ò àÊÕ´Ò ©Ñ¹äÁèÍÒ¨ªèÇ«Ѻ¹éÓµÒ
>>>> (ºÑ¹·Ö¡àÊÕ§ â´Â ÊØà·¾ ǧÈì¡Óá˧ àÁ×èÍ ¾.È. 2507)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The point is:
>>>> 
>>>> "ÈÕŸÃÃÁ à˹×ÍÊÔè§Í×è¹ã´"
>>>> 
>>>> While samuk and bad monk said "LAW above moral"
>>>> It try to use LAW to hurt moral people.
>>>> 
>>>> To solve this problem it has to use moral principle.
>>>> 
>>>> Samuk have to show that he has higher in moral practice but Samuk said 
>>>> "TUM D UPPLEE KIN HUA" instead.
>>>> 
>>>> The case of phra viharn are the same.
>>>> If it can used moral principle that it belong to whom then problem will 
>>>> stop.
>>>> but at this moment cambodia use badly law from bad france judge to force 
>>>> it to belong to cambodia so no moral TH persons can allow it.
>>>> 
>>>> LAW can ve used only to deal with bad and criminal persons like samuk and 
>>>> toxin only. !!!
>>>> 
>>>> It cannot apply to PTM esp maha JUMLONG anf pae LIM !!!
>>>> BOTH are high moral persons !!!
>>>> They can die in bad laws but they will never allow bad persons to alive.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> zxc555